« IronRuby at Tech Ed 2008 | Main | IronRuby at OSCON »

June 11, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834fc885d53ef00e553664cc18834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IronRuby and ASP.NET MVC:

Comments

Don't forget to encode that output!

You don't want the category "Shoes & Trainers" producing invalid HTML... or leading to injection/XSS from the inside.

[)amien

What about the possibility of using ActiveRecord with an MVC project?

Hi John,

Congrats. Good job getting done, under your expert guidance.

What about the possibility of using ActiveRecord / DataMapper with an MVC project?

Since Data mapper will be out very soon, i am also considering it.

SoftMind

I think I just peed in my pants a little bit.

Very, very cool :o)

I'm really, really, really, really looking forward to doing ASP.NET development with IronRuby (and any DLR-basd language). Really. Keep up the great work! :)

What's with the require "HomeModel" stuff? Give us the snake_case back!

Nice sample... not far away to use scaffold and ActiveRecord. can't wait to see it.

Hey John,

Do you have any idea when ASP.NET MVC Preview 4 is likely to be released ?

Also, do you have any take on whether there might be other reasons for people to use IronRuby for developing ASP.NET MVC applications rather than coming from Ruby background? Any specific Ruby benefit for this exact scenario ?

@Mohamed: I would expect about 6 weeks after their last release - which is mid-July by my calculations?

It's the idea about being able to define your business problems in an internal DSL. Ruby excels at doing this, and offers some pretty compelling advantages over other languages.

I want to know if ASP.NET MVC Preview 4 is released or not? if not then when is the date for the release?

@Ravindra: Yes it is - Google is your friend here :)

John is there a very simple way of doing this with just http word paragraphs. I wish that microsoft would provide some more examples on how to do this....

First, I enjoy this type of experimentation and like the direction you are going.
Ruby code does tend to have less cruft, but I wouldn't say no cruft. You may become immune to it (as C# coders become immune to semi-colons) - but look again and you will notice all of the extraneous $,:,{},> symbols in your ruby example (I know they aren't extraneous to the compiler).
I'm sure your ruby routing library allows for more advanced scenarios, but the examples you provided can be very easily emulated with a simple extension method:

Good article, thanks.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Photos

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from John Lam. Make your own badge here.

May 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Blog powered by TypePad